>> Buy & Sell Now

Contact Us

 Your Guide to Medical Imaging Equipment

Enjoy these tips, tricks and insights that answer 100's of questions we've received from radiology and imaging professionals that need help buying, selling, servicing and maintaining their medical imaging equipment: MRI, CT, C-Arm, Digital X-ray, PET/CT and Women's Health. We extend the life of imaging equipment so that healthcare providers worldwide can extend the lives of patients. This is why we answer your imaging equipment questions.

~ Block Imaging Team

Orthoscan HD1000 vs Orthoscan FD

Posted by Jordan Schneider

Jun 13, 2017 10:39:51 AM

:: 1 minute read ::

OrthoScan HD 1000 vs Orthoscan FD

The two most recent additions to the Orthoscan mini C-arm product line, the Orthoscan HD1000 and the Orthoscan FD, are practically identical. The list of things they have in common is far too long to share here so, in the interest of everyone's time, we'll share with you below the rather short list of things (2) that set these two mini C-arm models apart from one another.

Image Intensifier vs. Flat Panel Digital Detector

This is the most obvious difference. It's also the difference that the other difference stems from- but we'll get to that in a minute.

The Orthoscan HD1000 is an analog system that uses an image intensifier (II) as its X-ray receptor. This technology is older and can't attain the level of resolution that a digital detector can, but it is still reliable and, as digital C-arms continue through their early adoption phase, still the standard.

The Orthoscan FD is a digital system with a flat panel detector. As you just read, digital systems can provide images at higher resolution than analog (2k x 1.5k vs. 1k x 1k). This clarity and crispness is the advantage of choosing an FD over an HD1000.

System Cost

The cost difference between these two models is a direct product of the "II versus flat panel detector" matter. What we've seen in other modalities as they transition from analog to digital technologies holds true for C-arms as well: you don't get higher resolution for free. On average, an Orthoscan FD costs at least 20% more than an HD1000. 

The Takeaway

Beyond the "II versus flat panel detector" discussion, the Orthoscan HD1000 and the Orthoscan FD are pretty much identical. Their monitors, their interfaces, their generators- all the same. Because this high degree of similarity exists alongside the compelling reality of high digital resolution, our verdict is this:

If you have room in your budget, you won't regret having the image quality advantage of the flat panel detector technology found on the FD. If your budget requires you to be a little more frugal, the lower cost and continued reliability of an II-based system like the HD1000 may be a better fit at your facility.

If you have more questions about Orthoscan mini C-arms or mini C models, we're ready to help with those too. Use the button below to tell us what you need and start the conversation.

Request C-Arm Price

Written by Jordan Schneider

author of blog post

Jordan Schneider is a Project Coordinator at Block Imaging. His goal is to help navigate the pitfalls of complex projects for the smoothest installations necessary. When he’s not tackling logistics, Jordan enjoys camping, fishing, and tinkering with anything mechanical.

Topics: C-Arm

Post a Comment Here

Search this site

Get medical imaging equipment insights delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe below.

Resources, videos, and tools to learn more about your project
Meet the Block Imaging Team
See Imaging Equipment Prices

Questions? Ideas? Imaging project you'd like to discuss? Let us know!